Garbage collection services · California

EDCO Waste and Recycling

San Marcos, CA · ~191 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EDCO Waste and Recycling runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade D.

EDCO Waste and Recycling: 4.7 TCR = 181% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EDCO Waste and Recycling safety composite

EDCO Waste and Recycling scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

EDCO Waste and Recycling injury rate improved

EDCO Waste and Recycling's TCR fell 1.1 from 5.5 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · San Marcos, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 181% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #82/247
  • PHOTO Advanced Disposal - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 103 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advanced Disposal - Minocqua Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

EDCO Waste and Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EDCO Waste and Recycling averages 4.7 TCR (181% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EDCO Waste and Recycling TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=7 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 2.6

Where EDCO Waste and Recycling falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 247 Garbage collection services employers in California.

EDCO Waste and Recycling (191 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate EDCO Waste and Recycling
EDCO Waste and Recycling (191 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

EDCO Waste and Recycling has more employees than the Garbage collection services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.7 10 0 0
2023 9.6 5.3 26 1 0
2022 4.1 3.7 11 0 0
2021 0.5 0.4 13 1 0
2020 2.0 1.2 4 1 0
2019 4.7 3.5 12 0 0
2018 7.0 5.1 15 0 0
2017 5.5 4.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · San Marcos

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 139 employers in San Marcos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advanced Disposal - Minocqua Hauling 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patrick J. Stepaniak, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S02878 - WM of San Antonio 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Services of Midland, Duncan Disposal Division 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creekside Farms, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE WesPak, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Park Annex - Bld: 6792 - 01 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Industries 967 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08180552 SAN MARCOS MEDICAL CENTER 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR CASMR - SAN MARCOS 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAN MARCOS (CASMR) 555 FTE
NAT-TCR Countryside 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Bluff Middle School 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Die Cast 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mahuta Tool Corp 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kearny Nj 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE OXEA Corporation/OQ Chemicals 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Gypsum Baltimore 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Urban Elevator Service, LLC 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.