Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living

East Grand Forks, MN · ~46 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living: 4.8 TCR = 127% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living safety composite

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2022→2024

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living injury rate improved

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.2 in 2022 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.2 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · East Grand Forks, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/226
  • PHOTO Northridge
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living averages 4.8 TCR (127% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living TCR series: 2022=7.2 · 2023=4 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living (46 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living
Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living (46 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood East Grand Forks Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.2 7.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · East Grand Forks

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 18 employers in East Grand Forks, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northridge 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salishan 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Lebanon 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baptist Village of Ada 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canby 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk River Municipal Utilities 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Energy Saint Paul 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY EAST GRAND FORKS 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #595 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR R. J. Zavoral & Sons, Inc. 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hugo's #5 126 FTE
NAT-TCR West Liberty Foods 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Cruz Plumbing Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren Mott High Schools 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Merit Electric Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE McCartney Interiors 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Grown Organic Distributors, Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Adventist Tulare 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Principal Park and Cub Club 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.