Continuing care retirement communities · South Dakota

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls

Sioux Falls, SD · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls: 11.1 TCR = 291% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls safety composite

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2019→2021

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls injury rate improved

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls's TCR fell 7.6 from 14.9 in 2019 to 7.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.9 · 2021=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sioux Falls, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 291% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #12/22
  • PHOTO Encore Countryside M…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Encore Countryside Manor West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls averages 11.1 TCR (291% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls TCR series: 2019=14.9 · 2021=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 22 Continuing care retirement com employers in South Dakota.

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls (38 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls
Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls (38 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood Prairie Crossing Sioux Falls has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.3 7.3 0 2 0
2019 14.9 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SD · Sioux Falls

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 542 employers in Sioux Falls, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Encore Countryside Manor West 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suffolk Bickford 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SD, Watertown-Harmony Hill-Continuing Care Retirement Communities 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Lancaster 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rapid City Branch Office 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huff Construction Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Halme, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&R Contracting Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,Sioux Falls-Medical Center Campus-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 6,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,SIOUX FALLS - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 4,818 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Foods 3,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avera McKennan Hospital 3,312 FTE
NAT-TCR Lexington Clinic Ambulatory Service Center 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of South Windsor - Fire Department 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Benchmark-Marion 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Denver Ind. 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Power Supply 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vermicrop Organics 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Manufacturing Company 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Office Print Service 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.