Food service equipment (except refrigerated), commercial, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Edward Don & Company- GA

Norcross, GA · ~117 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edward Don & Company- GA runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food service equipment (except refrigerated), commercial, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Edward Don & Company- GA: 2.0 TCR = 90% of Food service equipment (except refrigerated), commercial, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edward Don & Company- GA safety composite

Edward Don & Company- GA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2022→2024

Edward Don & Company- GA injury rate improved

Edward Don & Company- GA's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.0 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423440 · Norcross, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Greenfield World Tra…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenfield World Trade, LLC. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Edward Don & Company- GA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edward Don & Company- GA averages 2.0 TCR (90% of the Food service equipment (except refrigerated), commercial, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edward Don & Company- GA TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=2 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.2

Where Edward Don & Company- GA falls in its industry

118 Food service equipment (except establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Food service equipment (except employers in Georgia.

Edward Don & Company- GA (117 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Edward Don & Company- GA
Edward Don & Company- GA (117 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Edward Don & Company- GA has more employees than the Food service equipment (except refrigera median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423440 · GA · Norcross

118 Food service equipment (except refrigerated), commercial, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 337 employers in Norcross, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenfield World Trade, LLC. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CES Charlotte 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Singer Kittredge 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel & Restaurant Supply Tuscaloosa 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Jefferson 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE SouthStar Energy Services 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bellwood 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Mechanical Contractors & Engineers, LLC 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Norcross 6585 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6585 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPA ATLANTA 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Galaxy Carson City LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Techniblend 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Dynamic Group Inc - Unity 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SC - Steering Columns 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE R. D. Olson Construction, Inc. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ilhc llc 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mara Technologies USA Inc. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE LJT 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.