Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments · Michigan

EES Coke Battery, LLC

Detroit, MI · ~159 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EES Coke Battery, LLC runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments workplace, earning a grade A.

EES Coke Battery, LLC: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EES Coke Battery, LLC safety composite

EES Coke Battery, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

EES Coke Battery, LLC: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.78× in 2024

EES Coke Battery, LLC's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324199 · Detroit, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Sonneborn, Petrolia …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonneborn, Petrolia Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

EES Coke Battery, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EES Coke Battery, LLC averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EES Coke Battery, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where EES Coke Battery, LLC falls in its industry

52 Coke oven products (e.g., coke establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Coke oven products (e.g., coke employers in Michigan.

EES Coke Battery, LLC (159 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate EES Coke Battery, LLC
EES Coke Battery, LLC (159 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 2.0

EES Coke Battery, LLC has more employees than the Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2023 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324199 · MI · Detroit

52 Coke oven products (e.g., coke, gases, tars) made in coke oven establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonneborn, Petrolia Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Arthur - Motiva 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rain CII Carbon - Gramercy 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rain CII Carbon - Chalmette 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sherriff-Goslin Company 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Olmsted Falls 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brembo Homer Foundry 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerson Automation Solutions 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Olin Corporation - Charleston plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 106 Facn - Middletown 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Y31 Aer - Fairview 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Heiskell & Co. Tulare Hillman 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Lingenfelter Center 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Falls Creek 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horwith Trucks / Penn Truck Leasing 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kitchen Magic, Inc 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.