Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance · Illinois

Effingham Trucking Terminal

Effingham, IL · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Effingham Trucking Terminal runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Effingham Trucking Terminal: 2.1 TCR = 47% of Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Effingham Trucking Terminal safety composite

Effingham Trucking Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2022

Effingham Trucking Terminal injury rate improved

Effingham Trucking Terminal's TCR fell 1.7 from 4.6 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Effingham, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 47% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #18/56
  • PHOTO Jordan Carriers Heav…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jordan Carriers Heavy Haul #2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Effingham Trucking Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Effingham Trucking Terminal averages 2.1 TCR (47% of the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Effingham Trucking Terminal TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Effingham Trucking Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Specialized Freight (except Us establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 56 Specialized Freight (except Us employers in Illinois.

Effingham Trucking Terminal (25 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Effingham Trucking Terminal
Effingham Trucking Terminal (25 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Effingham Trucking Terminal has fewer employees than the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2016 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · IL · Effingham

1,026 Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 104 employers in Effingham, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jordan Carriers Heavy Haul #2 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TARTER LOGISTICS 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR URS Stockton 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9613-1608 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Emerald Mound Lebanon Fire Department 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steve Piper and Sons, Inc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - IL Meter Services North 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Hospital, Effingham 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSHS St. Anthony's Memorial Hospital 582 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAE-EFFINGHAM-3 HSHS ST ANTHONY S MEMORIAL HOSP 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patterson Technolgy Center 456 FTE
NAT-TCR BM San Antonio A 33630 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 11 Syracuse EM 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Washington 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Essentra HPC Greensboro 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Border States Electric - Odessa 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAP Baton Rouge 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAP Birmingham 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedars of Liberty 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.