ALL printing operations including digital printing · Michigan

EGT Printing Solutions

Madison Heights, MI · ~57 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EGT Printing Solutions runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade A.

EGT Printing Solutions: 0.2 TCR = 7% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EGT Printing Solutions safety composite

EGT Printing Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EGT Printing Solutions held a steady TCR band

EGT Printing Solutions's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Madison Heights, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/55
  • PHOTO Modern Litho Print -…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Modern Litho Print - St. Louis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

EGT Printing Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EGT Printing Solutions averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EGT Printing Solutions TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where EGT Printing Solutions falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 55 ALL printing operations includ employers in Michigan.

EGT Printing Solutions (57 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate EGT Printing Solutions
EGT Printing Solutions (57 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

EGT Printing Solutions has fewer employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MI · Madison Heights

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Madison Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Modern Litho Print - St. Louis 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrick Printing Co., Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Specialty Cartons Richmond 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Press 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomingdale MI Facility 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville SC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dickinson Homes 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concraft Inc 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADISON HEIGHTS (MIMAD) 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIMAD - MADISON HEIGHTS 749 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET183 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET183 ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSP - MADISON HEIGHTS 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Dot Go 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MBS Service Company 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company (MPROC) Juncos 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Research Group 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loucks Mill 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Screw Products, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAT 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE 801 Spring Creek Road 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.