Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Washington

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC

Moses Lake, WA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade F.

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC: 13.7 TCR = 305% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC safety composite

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC: 7.8 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 21.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2021

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC's TCR rose 4.4 from 7.8 in 2019 to 12.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Moses Lake, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 305% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO NA Timmerman - Colby
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA Timmerman - Colby (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC averages 13.7 TCR (305% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC TCR series: 2019=7.8 · 2020=21.2 · 2021=12.2 · BLS 4.5

Where El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Washington.

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC (64 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC
El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC (64 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC has more employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.2 11.2 11 1 0
2020 21.2 18.0 4 9 0
2019 7.8 3.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · WA · Moses Lake

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 89 employers in Moses Lake, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA Timmerman - Colby 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Don Oppliger Companies 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JR Simplot Company-LL-Pasco Feedlot 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indianola Feedlot 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sagebrush Ranches LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Substation 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennewick General Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baxter Construction LLC 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terex Washington Moses Lake 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moses Lake, WA 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital (DBA Samaritan Healthcare) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital 497 FTE
NAT-TCR Bridgeview Courthouse 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Homeway Homes Facility 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcadia Inc. - ACU 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Park Yard Operation 6201 Peterson Road, Lake Park, GA 31636 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tree Trust Headquarters St Paul 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiggins Plastics 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Plaza Hotel - Cleveland Downtown 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospice of Hamilton 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.