Industrial process piping installation · South Carolina

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication

Richburg, SC · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial process piping installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication: 3.1 TCR = 110% of Industrial process piping installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication safety composite

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2021

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication injury rate improved

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication's TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Richburg, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/54
  • PHOTO HAROLD G. BUTZER, INC.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HAROLD G. BUTZER, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication averages 3.1 TCR (110% of the Industrial process piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication falls in its industry

5,793 Industrial process piping inst establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 54 Industrial process piping inst employers in South Carolina.

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication (49 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication
Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication (49 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Eldeco Pipe and Fabrication has fewer employees than the Industrial process piping installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2017 7.2 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · SC · Richburg

5,793 Industrial process piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in Richburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HAROLD G. BUTZER, INC. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reliable Ducts Heating and Cooling 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox & Hearn, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rycor HVAC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC Hatchery 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANGLEY ELECTRIC OPERATIONS 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broad River Electric Cooperative 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samet Corporation - Charleston SC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guardian Glass Richburg 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Specialty Materials - Richburg 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guardian Industries 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Natural Foods Inc - Richburg, SC 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Valve Manufacturing 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GrassWorx LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR J.S. Paris Excavating 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR B&H - Lititz 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Rochester Hills 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jessamine Medical and Diagnostic Center 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compass - Smyrna 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Arlington 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.