Distribution of electric power · Kentucky

Electric Operations

Bowling Green, KY · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electric Operations runs at 416% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Electric Operations: 5.0 TCR = 416% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electric Operations safety composite

Electric Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.7

2016→2024

Electric Operations injury rate improved

Electric Operations's TCR fell 14.7 from 17.4 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.4 · 2017=2.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Bowling Green, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 416% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/56
  • PHOTO Salt Springs Distric…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salt Springs District Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Electric Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electric Operations averages 5.0 TCR (416% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electric Operations TCR series: 2016=17.4 · 2017=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Electric Operations falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 56 Distribution of electric power employers in Kentucky.

Electric Operations (41 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Electric Operations
Electric Operations (41 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Electric Operations has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.4 0.0 1 1 0
2022 6.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 17.4 8.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · KY · Bowling Green

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salt Springs District Office 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendricks Power Cooperative 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STOCKTON - SOUTH CENTER 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN PINE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Murray Electric System 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Services - Belfry 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE E H Construction LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinnacle Inc - Benton KY 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Cameron 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Springs District Office 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lonestar Prestress Mfg., Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Supermercado La Chiquita No.3 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE J K Williams Home Office 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Products Area 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE De Troye Electric Service, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Julian A. McDermott Corp. 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.