Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing · Ohio

Electro Controls, Inc.

Sidney, OH · ~105 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electro Controls, Inc. runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Electro Controls, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electro Controls, Inc. safety composite

Electro Controls, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2024

Electro Controls, Inc. injury rate improved

Electro Controls, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.3 from 8.6 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335313 · Sidney, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO WINDSOR SAT CT
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WINDSOR SAT CT (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Electro Controls, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electro Controls, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electro Controls, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=1 · 2018=5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=2 · 2021=3 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=2 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Electro Controls, Inc. falls in its industry

226 Control panels, electric power establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Control panels, electric power employers in Ohio.

Electro Controls, Inc. (105 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Electro Controls, Inc.
Electro Controls, Inc. (105 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Electro Controls, Inc. has fewer employees than the Control panels, electric power distribut median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.1 4 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 6.1 0.0 6 0 0
2021 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 5.0 2.0 5 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 8.6 4.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335313 · OH · Sidney

226 Control panels, electric power distribution, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 100 employers in Sidney, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WINDSOR SAT CT 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trayer Engineering Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPI 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eaton Corporation 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Todhunter 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woda Construction Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Platform Cement Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Jackson Kitchen 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson Health 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Campus 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR NK Parts Main Campus 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1331 362 FTE
NAT-TCR S04108 - Simi Valley Landfill 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 020 Yauco 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Raleigh Downtown 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency at Fremont 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE EPD 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookwood Nursing Center, LLC dba Brookwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Menaul 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cal-Tex Protective Coatings, Inc. 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.