Graphite specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing · California

Electro-Tech Machining

Long Beach, CA · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electro-Tech Machining runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Graphite specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Electro-Tech Machining: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Graphite specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electro-Tech Machining safety composite

Electro-Tech Machining scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2018→2024

Electro-Tech Machining injury rate improved

Electro-Tech Machining's TCR fell 2.7 from 7.6 in 2018 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.6 · 2020=6.8 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335991 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO SGL Carbon
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SGL Carbon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Electro-Tech Machining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electro-Tech Machining averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Graphite specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electro-Tech Machining TCR series: 2018=7.6 · 2020=6.8 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Electro-Tech Machining falls in its industry

93 Graphite specialties for aeros establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Graphite specialties for aeros employers in California.

Electro-Tech Machining (33 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Electro-Tech Machining
Electro-Tech Machining (33 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Electro-Tech Machining has fewer employees than the Graphite specialties for aerospace use ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 3 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2018 7.6 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335991 · CA · Long Beach

93 Graphite specialties for aerospace use (except gaskets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SGL Carbon 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HITCO Carbon Composites, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matrix Composites 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SGL Composites Inc. 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Jasper Electric Motors Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Lake Wales 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Acadia Wholesale & Tobacco Co d/b/a Church Point Wholesale 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baton Rouge LA FXFE-BTR 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkway Health Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chief Manufacturing, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelena Farms, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1013 - Stevens Point 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.