Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Colorado

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation

Colorado Springs, CO · ~19 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation: 5.9 TCR = 178% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation safety composite

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation: 6.2 → 15.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.7× in 2024

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation's TCR rose 8.9 from 6.2 in 2017 to 15.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 178% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Diamond Chrome Plating
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Diamond Chrome Plating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation averages 5.9 TCR (178% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=15.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Electroplating metals and form employers in Colorado.

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation (19 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation
Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation (19 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Electronics Metal Finishing Corporation has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.1 10.0 3 0 0
2023 12.4 6.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.6 7.6 1 0 0
2017 6.2 6.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · CO · Colorado Springs

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Diamond Chrome Plating 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Casting Company-Curtis Street 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Electro Products Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Madhava Honey Ltd & Subsidiaries dba Madhava 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer LaSalle Research 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooley Mesa 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaPLata Electric Assn. 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR El Cajon Plant #29 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR All Other Employees - Other Government Support 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Briarwood Operator LLC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cavallero Heating & Air Cond., Inc. 5.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.