Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc.

Mckeesport, PA · ~89 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc.: 8.7 TCR = 262% of Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. safety composite

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. held a steady TCR band

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 8.1 in 2020 to 7.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=8.1 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Mckeesport, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 262% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #38/39
  • PHOTO ATS - 555 Plymouth
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATS - 555 Plymouth (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. averages 8.7 TCR (262% of the Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. TCR series: 2020=8.1 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=7.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. falls in its industry

387 Jigs and fixtures for use with establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 39 Jigs and fixtures for use with employers in Pennsylvania.

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. (89 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc.
Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. (89 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Elizabeth Carbide Die Co. Inc. has more employees than the Jigs and fixtures for use with machine t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.9 7.9 2 4 0
2021 10.1 5.0 4 4 0
2020 8.1 6.9 1 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · PA · Mckeesport

387 Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Mckeesport, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATS - 555 Plymouth 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hercules Tooling Group Fraser 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeastern Tool & Die 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Craft Technologies Inc. - Grand Rapids 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE HARSC Harrisburg Service Center 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE RS Mowery Sons 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDC (Hummel) 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refrigeration Design & Service 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR CORE Network LLC 1,699 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC McKeesport 916 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mon Yough Community Services Inc 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ryco, Inc. 182 FTE
NAT-TCR Home Care / Hospice 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03451 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03485 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02280 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ISD 16 Spring Lake Park, CVES Centerview Elementary School 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE OASIS Alignment Services LLC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0027-0026-03412 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0017-0016-00963 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.