Machine tool attachments and accessories manufacturing · Michigan

Elk Rapids Engineering

Elk Rapids, MI · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elk Rapids Engineering runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Machine tool attachments and accessories manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Elk Rapids Engineering: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Machine tool attachments and accessories manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elk Rapids Engineering safety composite

Elk Rapids Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2024

Elk Rapids Engineering injury rate improved

Elk Rapids Engineering's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · Elk Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/40
  • PHOTO Sandvik West Branch
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sandvik West Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Elk Rapids Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elk Rapids Engineering averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Machine tool attachments and accessories manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elk Rapids Engineering TCR series: 2016=7 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Elk Rapids Engineering falls in its industry

221 Machine tool attachments and a establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 40 Machine tool attachments and a employers in Michigan.

Elk Rapids Engineering (33 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elk Rapids Engineering
Elk Rapids Engineering (33 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Elk Rapids Engineering has fewer employees than the Machine tool attachments and accessories median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 7.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · MI · Elk Rapids

221 Machine tool attachments and accessories manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 5 employers in Elk Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sandvik West Branch 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comet Roll & Machine Co 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hammill Co-op Tool 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMCO Carbide Tool Inc. 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRH GROUP LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Svc Ctr 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpena Power Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnette Foods, Elk Rapids 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Short's Brewing Company Production Facility 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5025_11569 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Village of Elk Rapids 49 FTE
NAT-TCR JTB Furniture 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Terminal 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Corrpro Sand Springs 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilmington South Operations Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vincennes District Office 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Industries LLC - AK Steel - OH 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rain CII Carbon - Chalmette 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.