Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Minnesota

Elk River Campus

Elk River, MN · ~159 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elk River Campus runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Elk River Campus: 1.7 TCR = 138% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elk River Campus safety composite

Elk River Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2018→2024

Elk River Campus injury rate improved

Elk River Campus's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.5 in 2018 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.5 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Elk River, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 138% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #7/24
  • PHOTO Graham Steam Electri…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Graham Steam Electric Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Elk River Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elk River Campus averages 1.7 TCR (138% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elk River Campus TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=3 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Elk River Campus falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Minnesota.

Elk River Campus (159 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elk River Campus
Elk River Campus (159 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Elk River Campus has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.7 1.3 3 1 0
2020 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.0 0.8 4 0 0
2018 2.5 0.6 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Elk River

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 102 employers in Elk River, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Graham Steam Electric Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mill Creek 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Generating Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Energy Complex 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis SE Storage-TJ 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rich Products Fridley 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Surplus & Mfg., Inc (Ice Castle Fish Houses) 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Industrial Services, Inc. 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3209 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherburne County Government Center - General 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3209 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherburne County Government Center 367 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Wall Systems II, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Colors & Effects USA LLC - Peekskill 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Weston Buick GMC Kia 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DRP Headquarters 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kiolbassa Provision San Marcos Facility 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carver Healthcare LLC 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fowler 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zim Industries, Inc. 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.