Construction management, oil refinery and petrochemical complex · Colorado

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area

Longmont, CO · ~344 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, oil refinery and petrochemical complex workplace, earning a grade A.

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area: 0.4 TCR = 16% of Construction management, oil refinery and petrochemical complex BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area safety composite

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area held a steady TCR band

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Longmont, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #8/24
  • PHOTO Q3 Contracting Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Q3 Contracting Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area averages 0.4 TCR (16% of the Construction management, oil refinery and petrochemical complex BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area falls in its industry

809 Construction management, oil r establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 24 Construction management, oil r employers in Colorado.

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area (344 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area
Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area (344 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Elkhorn Construction, Front Range Service Area has more employees than the Construction management, oil refinery an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · CO · Longmont

809 Construction management, oil refinery and petrochemical complex employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 182 employers in Longmont, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Q3 Contracting Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lonesome Dove 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision West, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turnaround Welding Services 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GeoStabilization International 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiewit Corporation_9780 Mount Pyramid Court 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primoris Renewable Energy 345 FTE
STATE-SIZE CoorsTek, Inc. - Clear Creek Valley Plant 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont, CO 1,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont United Hospital 638 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-05500001-055001 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longs Peak Hospital 537 FTE
NAT-TCR Wisenbaker Builder Services - WF 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR B&E Resources 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Portland 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PITG 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakewood (Njlak) 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwalk (Ctnlk) 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Splitrock Resort 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pace industries, Harrison Division 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.