Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Minnesota

Elliott Aviation FCM

Eden Prarie, MN · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elliott Aviation FCM runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

Elliott Aviation FCM: 4.5 TCR = 100% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elliott Aviation FCM safety composite

Elliott Aviation FCM scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2019

Elliott Aviation FCM injury rate improved

Elliott Aviation FCM's TCR fell 2.2 from 5.6 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.6 · 2019=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Eden Prarie, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 100% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Duncan Aviation LNK
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duncan Aviation LNK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Elliott Aviation FCM in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elliott Aviation FCM averages 4.5 TCR (100% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elliott Aviation FCM TCR series: 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Elliott Aviation FCM falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Minnesota.

Elliott Aviation FCM (45 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Elliott Aviation FCM
Elliott Aviation FCM (45 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Elliott Aviation FCM has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2018 5.6 5.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MN · Eden Prarie

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Eden Prarie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duncan Aviation LNK 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 996 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hall Technical Services, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Jet Maintenance (dba JetWorx) 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVS - Eden Prairie 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Key Surgical Eden Prairie 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallel Technologies 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10210 Crosstown Circle 29 FTE
NAT-TCR LexaMar Corporation 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Logan Regional Medical Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Millennium Steel of Texas 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Faf Ind 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springtown Office and Shop 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.L. Klink & Sons, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastics Color Corporation of IL 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rowley Enterprises 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.