Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water) assembling on purchased chassis · Ohio

Elliott Machine Works

Galion, OH · ~58 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elliott Machine Works runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water) assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade D.

Elliott Machine Works: 4.2 TCR = 126% of Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water) assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elliott Machine Works safety composite

Elliott Machine Works scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Elliott Machine Works: 2.1 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2024

Elliott Machine Works's TCR rose 7.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Galion, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 126% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #20/38
  • PHOTO MG SPA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MG SPA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Elliott Machine Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elliott Machine Works averages 4.2 TCR (126% of the Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water) assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elliott Machine Works TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Elliott Machine Works falls in its industry

470 Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, m establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 38 Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, m employers in Ohio.

Elliott Machine Works (58 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Elliott Machine Works
Elliott Machine Works (58 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Elliott Machine Works has fewer employees than the Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 6.2 6 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 1 1 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2017 7.6 5.7 4 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · OH · Galion

470 Tank trucks (e.g., fuel oil, milk, water) assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 28 employers in Galion, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MG SPA 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henderson Products USC Ohio 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerset Welding & Steel Company Inc.- Dump Plant 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tebco of Ky 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Meadow Farms 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspire Energy 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Companies, LLC - N Ohio 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCY 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galion Hospital/Avita Health System 1,142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galion Community Hospital 1,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifetouch Church Directories Inc. Galion Plant 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR COVERT MANUFACTURING INC 275 FTE
NAT-TCR Health Human Services Agency 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie Moon Nursery 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Escape Theme Park, LP 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TMP Manufacturing 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ELITE Delivery Team 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardena Ca - 322 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albany Ga - 268 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recreation Centers 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.