Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade · Vermont

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland

Rutland, VT · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland: 7.0 TCR = 213% of Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland safety composite

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2020

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland injury rate improved

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland's TCR fell 11.6 from 16.0 in 2017 to 4.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Rutland, VT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 213% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK P26
  • PHOTO Premier Finishing
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Premier Finishing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland averages 7.0 TCR (213% of the Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland TCR series: 2017=16 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland falls in its industry

646 Powder coating metals and meta establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland (22 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland
Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland (22 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc. - Rutland has fewer employees than the Powder coating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 0 2 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 16.0 16.0 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · VT · Rutland

646 Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 65 employers in Rutland, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Premier Finishing 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ion bond - Chicago 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tech Etch Litchfield 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teknicote 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GMP General Service Center - Springfield 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wright Construction Co Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ouellette Plumbing & Heating Corporation 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08306 - Store # 8306 Rutland 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8306 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casella Corporate Office 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Pines Of Rutland 164 FTE
NAT-TCR Crescent Fruit & Vegetable, LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Turbo Wholesale Tires, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Granite Health & Rehab 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Ridge 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Cooperative West Gin 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miles Nursery, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE CORT Furniture Nashville, TN 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE The CORE Group- Upstate NY 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.