Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Pennsylvania

Ellwood National Crankshaft

Irvine, PA · ~129 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ellwood National Crankshaft runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade A.

Ellwood National Crankshaft: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ellwood National Crankshaft safety composite

Ellwood National Crankshaft scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

Ellwood National Crankshaft injury rate improved

Ellwood National Crankshaft's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.3 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Irvine, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #4/35
  • PHOTO Ellwood Crankshaft G…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ellwood Crankshaft Group Sharon Forge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ellwood National Crankshaft in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ellwood National Crankshaft averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ellwood National Crankshaft TCR series: 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Ellwood National Crankshaft falls in its industry

241 Forgings made from purchased i establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 35 Forgings made from purchased i employers in Pennsylvania.

Ellwood National Crankshaft (129 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ellwood National Crankshaft
Ellwood National Crankshaft (129 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Ellwood National Crankshaft has more employees than the Forgings made from purchased iron or ste median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · PA · Irvine

241 Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Irvine, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ellwood Crankshaft Group Sharon Forge 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Road 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daifuku Automotive America Corp 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laser Fabrication & Machine Co Inc 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsy Transportation 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert Ganter Contractors Inc 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lugaila Mechanical Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frey Lutz LLC 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bluestem Irvine Distribution Complex - South Bldg. 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellwood National Forge 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bluestem Irvine Distribution Complex - North Bldg. 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellwood Crankshaft Group 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson 10156 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Textron Aviation Tampa Service Center 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brockton - E Ashland St Bldg-Ma07 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tnber - Material Distribution Center 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland OR 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Pack, Inc. 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weaver Consultants Group North Central 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Biovation Labs LLC 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.