Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Georgia

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc

Cedartown, GA · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc: 1.1 TCR = 39% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc safety composite

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.91× in 2024

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Cedartown, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #19/71
  • PHOTO 2020
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2020 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc averages 1.1 TCR (39% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 71 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Georgia.

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc (42 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc
Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc (42 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Elmo Carter Construction Co., Inc has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · GA · Cedartown

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 25 employers in Cedartown, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2020 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clear Long Range Discrimination Radar 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashland, VA Office CS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IVMEL - Melbourne 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Pullet/Breeder Facility 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Bushnell, FL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Lavonia Hatchery 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedartown 552 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDTWGAAN 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 727 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Valley Nursing & Rehab Center 218 FTE
NAT-TCR Continuing Healthcare Cedar Hills LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR En-Chro Plating 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RDA Management 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Surfaces Southeast LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Luthy Equities Of New Jersey LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Gardens 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gericare Medical Supply 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Place 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.