Information management computer systems integration design services · California

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo

Covina, CA · ~81 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo runs at 390% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Information management computer systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo: 1.9 TCR = 390% of Information management computer systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo safety composite

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2020→2021

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo injury rate improved

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Covina, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.9 · 390% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/19
  • PHOTO Ocado Solutions USA …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocado Solutions USA Forest Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emanate Health Corporate Badillo averages 1.9 TCR (390% of the Information management computer systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo TCR series: 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Emanate Health Corporate Badillo falls in its industry

181 Information management compute establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 19 Information management compute employers in California.

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo (81 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Emanate Health Corporate Badillo
Emanate Health Corporate Badillo (81 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Emanate Health Corporate Badillo has fewer employees than the Information management computer systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · CA · Covina

181 Information management computer systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Covina, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Forest Park 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - Hebron 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - Terrell 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma County Information Technology Services 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE STS Ranch LLC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. R CRAIN AND SONS, INC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 200 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inter-Community Hospital 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Charter Oak 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR IKEA #413 Covina 316 FTE
NAT-TCR Gantt's Excavating & Contracting, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Newark Container Terminal 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Barrington Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulsa #541 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Travel Leaders Group- Plymouth 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winzeler Coupling and Ferrule 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Stanton 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cranberry 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.