Group homes for the disabled with nursing care · Ohio

Embracing Autism

Columbus, OH · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Embracing Autism runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Group homes for the disabled with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Embracing Autism: 8.6 TCR = 132% of Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Embracing Autism safety composite

Embracing Autism scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Embracing Autism injury rate improved

Embracing Autism's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=29.8 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=24.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #701/1074
  • PHOTO Medilodge of Montrose
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medilodge of Montrose (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Embracing Autism in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Embracing Autism averages 8.6 TCR (132% of the Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Embracing Autism TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=29.8 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=24.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Embracing Autism falls in its industry

15,252 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #701 safest of 1074 Group homes for the disabled w employers in Ohio.

Embracing Autism (43 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Embracing Autism
Embracing Autism (43 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Embracing Autism has fewer employees than the Group homes for the disabled with nursin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 24.1 24.1 0 6 0
2021 12.9 12.9 0 3 0
2020 29.8 29.8 0 7 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Columbus

15,252 Group homes for the disabled with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Montrose 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Post Acute 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Juniper Village at Lincoln Heights 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grace Manor Care Center 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CW Egg Products 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Marysville 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Clairsville Ohio 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresden Plant 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Vander Haag's Inc. - Des Moines 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Patrol Headquarters 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Racing Equipment Texas 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Park East Landfill 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lost Trail Dairy, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Ridge Dairy, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roscommon County Road Commission 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.