Aircraft manufacturing · Florida

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc.

Jacksonville, FL · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 40% of Aircraft manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. safety composite

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. injury rate improved

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/24
  • PHOTO Kratos Unmanned Aeri…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CARO1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (40% of the Aircraft manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. falls in its industry

390 Aircraft manufacturing establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 24 Aircraft manufacturing employers in Florida.

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Embraer Defense and Security, Inc.
Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Embraer Defense and Security, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 0.8 1 2 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 5.6 4.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · FL · Jacksonville

390 Aircraft manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CARO1 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA022 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Learjet Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MO008 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE DESOTO HARVESTING 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Fruit Packing LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Vcf 086 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandenburg Location 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette Container 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1MC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cronimet Corporation Aliquippa 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moses Y Beach Elementary School 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headlee Roofing 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rural Masonry Co Inc 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.