Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Emerald Bay Retirement Community

Name: Emerald Bay Retirement Community Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Hobart, WI · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 10.5
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerald Bay Retirement Community runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Emerald Bay Retirement Community: 10.5 TCR = 277% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerald Bay Retirement Community safety composite

Emerald Bay Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 10.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2017→2018

Emerald Bay Retirement Community injury rate improved

Emerald Bay Retirement Community's TCR fell 7.8 from 14.4 in 2017 to 6.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.4 · 2018=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hobart, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 277% of ind

DART 6.6 DART
RANK #227/273
PHOTO Oakmont of Lodi
BOOK 2y book
INJ 9 inj
SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Lodi (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

10.5
Oakmont of Lod

10.5
Lodge Assisted

10.5
Dillsburg, Elm

10.5
AX-HHH2-SPRING

10.5

What this shows Emerald Bay Retirement Community averages 10.5 TCR (277% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Emerald Bay Retirement Community TCR series: 2017=14.4 · 2018=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Emerald Bay Retirement Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Emerald Bay Retirement Community (66 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Emerald Bay Retirement Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	6.6	6.6	4	0	0
2017	14.4	11.6	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Hobart

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 8 employers in Hobart, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Oakmont of Lodi	LODI, CA	10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Lodge Assisted Living LLC	COLORADO SPRINGS, CO	10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dillsburg, Elmcroft of	DILLSBURG, PA	10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AX-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR APEX	APEX, NC	10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Okray Family Farms, Inc	PLOVER	66 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Tidy View Dairy, LLC	KAUKAUNA	66 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wysocki Produce Farm - Paramount Ag	BANCROFT	66 FTE
STATE-SIZE	3757_10365	OSHKOSH	66 FTE
CITY-NEAR	EMTRO LLC	Hobart	153 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Green Bay, WI Facility	Hobart	151 FTE
CITY-NEAR	EMT International	Hobart	140 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SCAL Hobart, LLC dba Emerald Bay Retirement Community	Hobart	108 FTE
NAT-TCR	Rowe	Martinsville, IL	10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Valley Communications Center	Van Nuys, CA	10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Eagle Merchandising Solutions, LLC	Kennesaw, GA	10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tmx2223 - Pleasanton	Pleasanton, CA	10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Snyir Inc.	Sacramento, CA	66 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Dells Nursing and Rehab Center, Inc.	Dell Rapids, SD	66 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Daleville	Daleville, IN	66 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Goldstein & Burton dba Nu Products Seasoning Co.	Oakland, NJ	66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.