Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation

Barnesville, OH · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation runs at 452% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation: 29.4 TCR = 452% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.2

2020→2024

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 19.2 from 38.3 in 2020 to 19.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 38.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=38.3 · 2022=29.4 · 2023=30.7 · 2024=19.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Barnesville, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 29.4 · 452% of ind

  • DART 19.1 DART
  • RANK #1073/1074
  • PHOTO Lakeland Nursing and…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakeland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation averages 29.4 TCR (452% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2020=38.3 · 2022=29.4 · 2023=30.7 · 2024=19.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1073 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation (80 employees, TCR 29.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation
Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation (80 employees, TCR 29.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.1 19.1 0 11 0
2023 30.7 27.8 2 19 0
2022 29.4 29.4 1 18 0
2020 38.3 38.3 1 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Barnesville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 8 employers in Barnesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakeland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rural Healthacare Center 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Morgan City 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-215 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Cleveland 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Dayton 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA OH Brecksville 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Baumann Plumbing, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnesville Hospital Association 893 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnesville Hospital 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerald Pointe Health & Rehabilitation 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR #11 Barnesville 74 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakeland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 29.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Concast Inc Zumbrota 29.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Morgan City 29.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE DWM Holdings 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coefficient Systems Testing, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Package Design & Manufacturing 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBCO 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.