Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing · Texas

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility

Houston, TX · ~227 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility safety composite

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility held a steady TCR band

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333995 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Motion Systems : Des…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~227 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Motion Systems : Des Plaines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility falls in its industry

137 Actuators, fluid power, manufa establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Actuators, fluid power, manufa employers in Texas.

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility (227 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility
Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility (227 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Emerson Process Management Crossridge Facility has more employees than the Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333995 · TX · Houston

137 Actuators, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Motion Systems : Des Plaines 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAMROD INDUSTRIES LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Branch 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enertech 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Summit ESP - Midland/Odessa, TX 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tellepsen Builders, L.P. 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOW Specialties,LLC 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Abacus LLC 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Rapids, IA - Prairie Val 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CANONSBURG 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Leased Housing BX MA Qns 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LeFrak Estates LP - NY 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burkett's Pool Plastering Inc 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8027684 Vitro Westland 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE 298 - Howard WI 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE 295 - Franklin 227 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.