Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

EML

Sacramento, CA · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EML runs at 662% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

EML: 25.1 TCR = 662% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EML safety composite

EML scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2020→2024

EML injury rate improved

EML's TCR fell 12.9 from 32.1 in 2020 to 19.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 111.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=32.1 · 2021=111.5 · 2023=24.1 · 2024=19.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.1 · 662% of ind

  • DART 15.4 DART
  • RANK #621/635
  • PHOTO RPH-East Memory Care…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RPH-East Memory Care Residences at Creekstone (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

EML in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EML averages 25.1 TCR (662% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EML TCR series: 2020=32.1 · 2021=111.5 · 2023=24.1 · 2024=19.2 · BLS 3.8

Where EML falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #621 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

EML (26 employees, TCR 25.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate EML
EML (26 employees, TCR 25.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

EML has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.2 15.4 5 0 0
2023 24.1 8.0 6 0 0
2021 111.5 107.3 3 24 0
2020 32.1 32.1 1 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Sacramento

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RPH-East Memory Care Residences at Creekstone 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atria Evergreen Valley 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Orchard Park 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere at Chestnut Lane 25.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Rainier 25.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Quincy Healthcare & Senior Living LLC 25.1 TCR
NAT-TCR McKenzie Manor 25.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Parker Oaks Senior Living 25.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MN Department of Veterans Affairs - Progams & Services/Cemeteries 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 150-FREER 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 115-E Bernard 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Pines Care Center 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.