Memory boards manufacturing · New York

EMS Technologies, Inc

Name: EMS Technologies, Inc Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Binghamton, NY · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 1.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EMS Technologies, Inc runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Memory boards manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

EMS Technologies, Inc: 1.7 TCR = 53% of Memory boards manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EMS Technologies, Inc safety composite

EMS Technologies, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EMS Technologies, Inc held a steady TCR band

EMS Technologies, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Binghamton, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 53% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #11/13
PHOTO Benchmark Winona
BOOK 7y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benchmark Winona (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

HT Global Circ

1.8
Shore Printed

1.8
This site

1.7
Benchmark Wino

1.7
EC- CAES Syste

1.7

What this shows EMS Technologies, Inc averages 1.7 TCR (53% of the Memory boards manufacturing BLS benchmark).

EMS Technologies, Inc TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where EMS Technologies, Inc falls in its industry

236 Memory boards manufacturing establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Memory boards manufacturing employers in New York.

EMS Technologies, Inc (32 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

EMS Technologies, Inc has fewer employees than the Memory boards manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	0.0	0.0	0
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	5.7	5.7	2
2018	6.5	0.0	2
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · NY · Binghamton

236 Memory boards manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 139 employers in Binghamton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Benchmark Winona	WINONA, MN	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	EC- CAES Systems LLC	SAN JOSE, CA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	HT Global Circuits	ST. PETERSBURG, FL	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Shore Printed Circuits	EATONTOWN, NJ	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Schofield Farms LLC	SHERMAN	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CSS Farms - Bliss	BLISS	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	1482 West Genesee Road, Baldwinsville NY	BALDWINSVILLE	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	166 Gary Dr., Brockport, NY 14420	BROCKPORT	32 FTE
CITY-NEAR	United Health Services Hospitals, Inc.	Binghamton	2,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1855-NYBIN1	Binghamton	1,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Southern Tier Independence Center	Binghamton	698 FTE
CITY-NEAR	KIRKWOOD PLANT	Binghamton	544 FTE
NAT-TCR	Solon Specialty Wire	Solon, OH	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	London KY	London, KY	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Harvard Chemical, LLC	Atlanta, GA	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Nation Ford Chemical Company	Fort Mill, SC	1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Kema-Powertest, LLC	Chalfont, PA	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	DTE Stockton, LLC	Stockton, CA	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Dominion Bristol, LLC	Bristol, TN	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Brookdale Lawrenceville	Lawrenceville, GA	32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.