Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Indiana

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc.

Greenwood, IN · ~165 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. safety composite

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc.: 2.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc.'s TCR rose 1.1 from 2.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Greenwood, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO MCC Controls, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCC Controls, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=4 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. falls in its industry

322 Viscosimeters, industrial proc establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Viscosimeters, industrial proc employers in Indiana.

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. (165 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc.
Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. (165 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Endress and Hauser Flow USA Inc. has more employees than the Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.5 4 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 5 0 0
2022 2.0 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · IN · Greenwood

322 Viscosimeters, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 168 employers in Greenwood, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCC Controls, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CT112 HAYDON KERK 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. (OSTI) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MO122 OBRIEN 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Refrigeration LLC DBA Premistar North, General Mechanical 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hills Pet Nutrition 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheridan 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA-RBS-RICHMOND IN 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND9 2,588 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND9 2,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty GWD 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty 715 FTE
NAT-TCR Innovation Foods 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Inpria 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Careone at Trinitas Regional Medical Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0297 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OQ Chemicals Corporation Bay City TX 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phil's BBQ of Point Loma Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Charles Madras 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Country Club 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.