Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Massachusetts

Ene Systems, Inc.

Canton, MA · ~168 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ene Systems, Inc. runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Ene Systems, Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 155% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ene Systems, Inc. safety composite

Ene Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Ene Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Ene Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=8.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Canton, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/140
  • PHOTO Kruck Plumbing and H…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kruck Plumbing and Heating Co, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Ene Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ene Systems, Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (155% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ene Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=8.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Ene Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 140 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Massachusetts.

Ene Systems, Inc. (168 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ene Systems, Inc.
Ene Systems, Inc. (168 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Ene Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.7 5.0 8 0 0
2022 7.3 5.1 10 0 0
2021 3.9 0.7 5 1 0
2020 3.3 0.0 5 0 0
2018 8.1 3.1 13 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MA · Canton

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kruck Plumbing and Heating Co, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3352_6465 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR B Z Plumbing Company, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paschal Air Plumbing and Electric - Nixa 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern General Contractors Inc 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Restoration 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Refrigeration Company 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE G Lopes Construction Inc 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Evangelical Community Hospital 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Inwat - Waterloo 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hall High School 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North Phoenix 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE VWGoA NARDC/PDC 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four Points by Sheraton Los Angeles International Airport 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakewood Camping Resort 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brockport 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.