Alkaline cell primary batteries manufacturing · North Carolina

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1

Asheboro, NC · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Alkaline cell primary batteries manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Alkaline cell primary batteries manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 safety composite

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 held a steady TCR band

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.9 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.9 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335912 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Saft America Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saft America Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Alkaline cell primary batteries manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 TCR series: 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 falls in its industry

42 Alkaline cell primary batterie establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Alkaline cell primary batterie employers in North Carolina.

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 (173 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1
Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 (173 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 1 has fewer employees than the Alkaline cell primary batteries manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2022 1.9 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335912 · NC · Asheboro

42 Alkaline cell primary batteries manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saft America Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integer 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duracell Manufacturing 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lithium Division 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baucom's Nursery Company 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samet Corporation 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 3 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michaels Artistree 6612 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR GCCOM Construction Company, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Disposal Technologies, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Roofing Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR W.E.Bowers 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2396 - Red Mill 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2075 - Philadelphia Bridesburg 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters and Wolf Construction Specialties 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christus Spohn Beeville-114 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.