Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Contractors · Georgia

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC

Columbus, GA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC: 10.8 TCR = 386% of Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC safety composite

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC: 7.3 → 17.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2024

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC's TCR rose 9.7 from 7.3 in 2022 to 17.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Columbus, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 386% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #117/123
  • PHOTO Sun Plumbing
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sun Plumbing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC averages 10.8 TCR (386% of the Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC TCR series: 2022=7.3 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=17 · BLS 2.8

Where Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC falls in its industry

5,793 Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Condi establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 123 Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Condi employers in Georgia.

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC (64 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC
Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC (64 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Energy Savers of Georgia and Alabama,LLC has more employees than the Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.0 13.6 10 0 0
2023 8.1 8.1 5 0 0
2022 7.3 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · GA · Columbus

5,793 Plumbing,Heating,and Air-Conditioning Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sun Plumbing 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES MECHANICAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR James E Conner Jr Plumbing Inc 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCR Northern 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oakley Ind Operating - 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd. Union City 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Operating 205 Dairy Pac Rd Athens 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE OREMC Nahunta 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Snow Country Hardwoods, Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fincantieri Marine Repair 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The St. Regis San Francisco 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendricks Behavioral Hospital 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Premier Equipment Corporation 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midas Trucking 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE HIX Corporation 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwood Cabinets, Inc. 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.