Storage batteries manufacturing · California

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Storage batteries manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs: 3.7 TCR = 111% of Storage batteries manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs safety composite

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2024

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs injury rate improved

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs's TCR fell 7.4 from 8.8 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=6.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335911 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 111% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #13/19
  • PHOTO EnerSys Advanced Sys…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EnerSys Advanced Systems Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EnerSys Santa Fe Springs averages 3.7 TCR (111% of the Storage batteries manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=6.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where EnerSys Santa Fe Springs falls in its industry

161 Storage batteries manufacturin establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 19 Storage batteries manufacturin employers in California.

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs (56 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate EnerSys Santa Fe Springs
EnerSys Santa Fe Springs (56 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1

EnerSys Santa Fe Springs has fewer employees than the Storage batteries manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 3 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 6.1 4.0 3 0 0
2019 5.2 3.5 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 8.8 7.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335911 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

161 Storage batteries manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EnerSys Advanced Systems Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewisville TX 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trojan Battery Clark Street 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuasa Battery Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastside Dairy, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gallagher Corporation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shaklee DC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WireCrafters Louisville 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE EnerSys Norcross 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norris Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparta Distribution Center 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chelsea Place 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.