Mechanical engineering services · Texas

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc.

Richardson, TX · ~163 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mechanical engineering services workplace, earning a grade B.

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 70% of Mechanical engineering services BLS 0.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. safety composite

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Richardson, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/62
  • PHOTO Connectivity Wireless
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Connectivity Wireless (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (70% of the Mechanical engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. falls in its industry

690 Mechanical engineering service establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 62 Mechanical engineering service employers in Texas.

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. (163 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc.
Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. (163 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Engineered Air Balance Co., Inc. has more employees than the Mechanical engineering services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.2 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · TX · Richardson

690 Mechanical engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 220 employers in Richardson, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Connectivity Wireless 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visalia CA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latitude 33 Planning & Engineering 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TKDA 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE RiceTec Alvin Research Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport LNG Development LP 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove Steam Electric Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pattern Energy Group LP 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 2,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Richardson Medical Center 1,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR RFAB 1,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-TEXAS.RICHARDSON 1,266 FTE
NAT-TCR Placid Refining Company LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Kennedy Space Campus (1337) 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vertical Access Solutions LLC - Midwest 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR G&M Electric 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joy Global Underground Mining LLC- Charleroi 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polymers 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Warehousing Inc 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, LLC - New London CT 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.