Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · Ohio

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18

Painesville, OH · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 safety composite

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 held a steady TCR band

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Painesville, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/30
  • PHOTO Klockner Pentaplast …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Klockner Pentaplast of America KBF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 falls in its industry

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated s establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 30 Acrylic film and unlaminated s employers in Ohio.

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 (54 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18
Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 (54 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Engineered Films Plant--Bldg 18 has fewer employees than the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · OH · Painesville

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 67 employers in Painesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Klockner Pentaplast of America KBF 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tredegar Film Products 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Films Plant- Concord 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Plant 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C.M. Brown Nurseries, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butt Construction Co., Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office/Shop 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Construction Comany-Columbus 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lubrizol Painesville Township Plant 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avery Dennison Performance Tapes 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #6377 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ranpak 178 FTE
NAT-TCR ARE - Greater Boston Region 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Logistics, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Natural Gas Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bg Lpc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 40150 - Capstone Family Dollar Memphis Ar 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte DC FSP09 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE UTC Railcar Repair Services - Waterloo, IA 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newburgh Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Newburgh 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.