General Warehousing · Indiana

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis: 1.4 TCR = 24% of General Warehousing BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis safety composite

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis held a steady TCR band

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/366
  • PHOTO Romark Texas, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Romark Texas, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Materials : Indianapolis averages 1.4 TCR (24% of the General Warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Engineered Materials : Indianapolis falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 366 General Warehousing employers in Indiana.

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis (35 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Materials : Indianapolis
Engineered Materials : Indianapolis (35 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Engineered Materials : Indianapolis has fewer employees than the General Warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Indianapolis

9,477 General Warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Romark Texas, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ODU North American Logistics, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hero Logistics - LCD 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 3489 - Fort Lauderdale 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oak Basin Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crawfordsville LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2164-Evansville, IN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2527-Windfall, IN 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Times Supermarket McCully 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Braga Ranch El Centro 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR El Campo Svc Ctr 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Poplar Creek Senior Care 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Foundations, LLC (DBA) Diversified Excavation 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fraticelli Oil 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lucky Bucks, LLC 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.