Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · Tennessee

Engineered Materials : Lebanon

Lebanon, TN · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Materials : Lebanon runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Engineered Materials : Lebanon: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Materials : Lebanon safety composite

Engineered Materials : Lebanon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2023

Engineered Materials : Lebanon injury rate improved

Engineered Materials : Lebanon's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Lebanon, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Flexitallic US - Dee…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flexitallic US - Deer Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Materials : Lebanon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Materials : Lebanon averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Materials : Lebanon TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=4 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Engineered Materials : Lebanon falls in its industry

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D employers in Tennessee.

Engineered Materials : Lebanon (56 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Materials : Lebanon
Engineered Materials : Lebanon (56 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Engineered Materials : Lebanon has fewer employees than the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · TN · Lebanon

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 148 employers in Lebanon, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flexitallic US - Deer Park 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR THERMOSEAL INC Sidney 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chesterton - Groveland 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EGC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Tennessee EMC - Brownsville 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vintage 1857 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vintage Alcoa 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doss Brothers Construction, Inc. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA2 1,311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson County Government 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA8 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA2 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamonex 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Valley Container 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ReEnergy Black River 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Seyer Industries 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 048-Hereford/E Park 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 087-El Paso/8201 Dyer 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 117-Denver/Pecos St 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 099-Albuquerque/4th St 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.