Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Ohio

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus)

Columbus, OH · ~283 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus): 3.8 TCR = 115% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) safety composite

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2024

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) injury rate improved

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus)'s TCR fell 1.2 from 4.5 in 2022 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 115% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Engineered Profiles …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~283 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Profiles LLC Ironton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) averages 3.8 TCR (115% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) TCR series: 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Ohio.

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) (283 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus)
Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) (283 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Engineered Profiles, LLC (Columbus) has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.4 12 0 0
2023 3.6 2.4 9 0 0
2022 4.5 3.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · OH · Columbus

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Profiles LLC Ironton 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BD CUSTOM MANUFACTURING, INC. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunbelt Plastics 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elbridge Campus 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lewisburg Container LLC 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axium New Albany Plant #2 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1058 - Columbus Central 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland - CO 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Hallmark Iron Works, Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Island Store 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crest Foods Store 1 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Messick'S Farm Equipment 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chartwell Wisconsin, LLC, dba UW Health Care Direct 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Morrison / Scottsdale 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Glass Works 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Appleton East 283 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.