Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant · Wisconsin

Englewood Marketing Group

Green Bay, WI · ~112 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Englewood Marketing Group runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant workplace, earning a grade F.

Englewood Marketing Group: 4.5 TCR = 204% of Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Englewood Marketing Group safety composite

Englewood Marketing Group scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Englewood Marketing Group held a steady TCR band

Englewood Marketing Group's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.7 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.7 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423620 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 204% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK P24
  • PHOTO EMG West, INC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMG West, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Englewood Marketing Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Englewood Marketing Group averages 4.5 TCR (204% of the Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Englewood Marketing Group TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=4 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=4.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Englewood Marketing Group falls in its industry

91 Appliances, household-type (ex establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Englewood Marketing Group (112 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Englewood Marketing Group
Englewood Marketing Group (112 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Englewood Marketing Group has more employees than the Appliances, household-type (except water median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.1 4.1 5 0 0
2020 6.2 6.2 4 0 0
2019 4.0 3.2 5 0 0
2018 3.7 1.5 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423620 · WI · Green Bay

91 Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMG West, INC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Wholesale Supply Company 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boca Raton Experience Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marlborough 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northside Elevator Loyal 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denali Ingredients Calhoun 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birchwood Plant 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodport Doors LLC 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Gilster MaryLee Steeleville Pasta Plant 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St Peters 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ADESA Indianapolis 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Erie Electric - Mansfield Division 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Automotive Supply Associates Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kraton Chemical LLC, Dover Site 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere TCR Brighton 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Foods, Inc.- AZ 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.