Nuclear Electric Power Distibution · Michigan

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2

Newport, MI · ~931 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear Electric Power Distibution workplace, earning a grade A.

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2: 0.4 TCR = 36% of Nuclear Electric Power Distibution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 safety composite

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2: 0.1 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Newport, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK P24
  • PHOTO KEWAUNEE
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~931 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KEWAUNEE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 averages 0.4 TCR (36% of the Nuclear Electric Power Distibution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Distibu establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 (931 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2
Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 (931 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Enrico Fermi Power Plant 2 has more employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Distibution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.3 5 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 3 0 0
2022 1.2 0.7 9 2 0
2021 0.5 0.1 2 2 0
2020 0.2 0.1 1 1 0
2019 0.5 0.3 4 0 0
2018 0.4 0.1 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.1 0.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MI · Newport

80 Nuclear Electric Power Distibution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 22 employers in Newport, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KEWAUNEE 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal River Nuclear Plant 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indian Point Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monticello Training Center 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE DO & CO Detroit 931 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCA Davison Rd Processing Center 933 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldwater Facility 926 FTE
STATE-SIZE 610 VHS DETROIT RECEIVING HOSP INC 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer DC880 Newport 881 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 881 - Newport Grocery 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR DTE Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Modifications Maintenance Services and Engineering 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mid-American Group 200 FTE
NAT-TCR 201 Building 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 310 Building 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Forbes Homes, Inc. dba Forbes Capretto Homes 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pritchard Industries Southwest, LLC. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE NuVasive, Inc 931 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Lifesciences Technology Sarl 931 FTE
NAT-SIZE Osceola Food, LLC. 931 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advocate Trinity Hospital 931 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.