Roofing contractors · Ohio

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company

Dayton, OH · ~91 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company: 4.9 TCR = 174% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company safety composite

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company: 5.2 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2024

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company's TCR rose 0.8 from 5.2 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 174% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #72/86
  • PHOTO DAUGHERTY CONSTRUCTI…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAUGHERTY CONSTRUCTION INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company averages 4.9 TCR (174% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 86 Roofing contractors employers in Ohio.

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company (91 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company
Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company (91 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 3.0 4 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 5.0 0.0 3 0 0
2021 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2019 7.5 4.5 5 0 0
2016 5.2 3.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · OH · Dayton

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAUGHERTY CONSTRUCTION INC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecta Billerica 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CityScape Roofing, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mikalan Roofing, Inc 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gahanna 825 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Columbus 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.E. Middleton Construction Main office 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craftsman Electric, Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Cherrylake Main Office 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Pacific Windows - Medford 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 107 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MINOT 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linde-Griffith Construction Co. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southpointe Pavilions 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwood Park 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar North Texas - 1026 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.