Asbestos abatement services · North Carolina

Environmental Holdings Group

Morrisville, NC · ~292 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Environmental Holdings Group runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Asbestos abatement services workplace, earning a grade B.

Environmental Holdings Group: 1.8 TCR = 69% of Asbestos abatement services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Environmental Holdings Group safety composite

Environmental Holdings Group scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Environmental Holdings Group injury rate improved

Environmental Holdings Group's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Morrisville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Olympus Technical Se…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olympus Technical Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Environmental Holdings Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Environmental Holdings Group averages 1.8 TCR (69% of the Asbestos abatement services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Environmental Holdings Group TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Environmental Holdings Group falls in its industry

672 Asbestos abatement services establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Asbestos abatement services employers in North Carolina.

Environmental Holdings Group (292 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Environmental Holdings Group
Environmental Holdings Group (292 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Environmental Holdings Group has more employees than the Asbestos abatement services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2021 1.3 0.3 5 0 0
2020 0.8 0.3 3 0 0
2019 2.2 0.5 9 0 0
2018 2.4 0.2 10 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · NC · Morrisville

672 Asbestos abatement services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 219 employers in Morrisville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olympus Technical Services, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cleaning Guys, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAS Seattle 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perdue Environmental Contracting Co., Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE HP - High Performance 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE AAF Flanders FFI 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1613 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1614 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Development Drive 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC_Morrisville_4200 Paramount Pkwy_ECA42PAR 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Think Place 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
NAT-TCR Equipment Depot Texas, Inc. - Longview 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pegasus Industries & Packaging -Cane Run Road 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burien Grocery Outlet 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwestern Millwright of Fort Morgan, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DDT4 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited Williamsburg 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westlake Chemical Plaquemine LA 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phillips & Temro 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.