Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · California

Environmental Systems Inc

Santa Clara, CA · ~88 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Environmental Systems Inc runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Environmental Systems Inc: 1.2 TCR = 43% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Environmental Systems Inc safety composite

Environmental Systems Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2023

Environmental Systems Inc injury rate improved

Environmental Systems Inc's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Santa Clara, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/594
  • PHOTO QUALITY REFRIGERATIO…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QUALITY REFRIGERATION COMPANY, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Environmental Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Environmental Systems Inc averages 1.2 TCR (43% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Environmental Systems Inc TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Environmental Systems Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 594 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in California.

Environmental Systems Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Environmental Systems Inc
Environmental Systems Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Environmental Systems Inc has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 3 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Santa Clara

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Santa Clara, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QUALITY REFRIGERATION COMPANY, INC. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Impact Fire - Morrisville, NC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Boston) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Strelic Plumbing Inc, dba Advance Plumbing Company 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Hill Ranches Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Campus 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pure Storage 5,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120751 3,887 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620751 3,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Collin Creek Assisted Living Center Inc DBA DaySpring Senior Living 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Minore's Meats, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly #10 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR F&R Construction 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Three Brothers Wineries and Estates, LLC 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frain Industries Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Creek Nursing 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koppy's Propane 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.