Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Connecticut

Epifano Builders Inc.

Milford, CT · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Epifano Builders Inc. runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Epifano Builders Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 137% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Epifano Builders Inc. safety composite

Epifano Builders Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Epifano Builders Inc.: 5.8 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Epifano Builders Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 5.8 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Milford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 137% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/55
  • PHOTO Hardy Corporation
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hardy Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Epifano Builders Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Epifano Builders Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (137% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Epifano Builders Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Epifano Builders Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 55 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Connecticut.

Epifano Builders Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Epifano Builders Inc.
Epifano Builders Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Epifano Builders Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.2 5.6 2 0 0
2016 5.8 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CT · Milford

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 130 employers in Milford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hardy Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shaw-Lundquist Associates Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alvada Const. Co, Inc.- ACI 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Star General Contractors, Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milford Power Company LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE E&N Associates, LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-CT-East Granby-International Drive 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park Maintenance 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edgewell 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milford Hospital 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital Milford Campus 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edgewell Personal care 526 FTE
NAT-TCR Bessemer/Construction 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Germain's Cabinet, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Restore Health & Wellness, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1334 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Street (#138) 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPAWAR St. Julien's Creek 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Federal Building 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feder Mechanical 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.