General warehousing and storage · Michigan

EQ Systems

Cassopolis, MI · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EQ Systems runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

EQ Systems: 5.5 TCR = 95% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EQ Systems safety composite

EQ Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−81.1

2023→2024

EQ Systems injury rate improved

EQ Systems's TCR fell 81.1 from 86.7 in 2023 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 86.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=86.7 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Cassopolis, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.5 · 95% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #127/194
  • PHOTO MN - Bayer
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MN - Bayer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

EQ Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EQ Systems averages 5.5 TCR (95% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EQ Systems TCR series: 2023=86.7 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 5.8

Where EQ Systems falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 194 General warehousing and storag employers in Michigan.

EQ Systems (120 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EQ Systems
EQ Systems (120 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

EQ Systems has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 3.7 5 1 0
2023 86.7 74.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Cassopolis

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cassopolis, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MN - Bayer 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYNCR - LOUISVILLE - HEALTHCARE 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butcher Engineering Enterprises LTD 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3404 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elzinga & Volkers Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fennville MI 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ovid Plant 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ludington Plant 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Postle Extrusion 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Energy Cooperative 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cass County Medical Care Facility 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Energy & Communications 137 FTE
NAT-TCR Naperville 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR La Quinta Resort & Spa 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Langlas & Associates 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Uttermost Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bella Terra Of Lombard 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHG Montclair Beverage LLC 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary's of Medford, Inc. dba St. Mary's School 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE thyssenkrupp Logistics 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.