Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing · Texas

Equipment Training Services

Killeen, TX · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Equipment Training Services runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Equipment Training Services: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Equipment Training Services safety composite

Equipment Training Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Equipment Training Services injury rate improved

Equipment Training Services's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336992 · Killeen, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Field Services
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Field Services (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Equipment Training Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Equipment Training Services averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Equipment Training Services TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Equipment Training Services falls in its industry

49 Tanks, military (including fac establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Tanks, military (including fac employers in Texas.

Equipment Training Services (48 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Equipment Training Services
Equipment Training Services (48 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Equipment Training Services has fewer employees than the Tanks, military (including factory rebui median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336992 · TX · Killeen

49 Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 83 employers in Killeen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Field Services 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems - Platforms & Services - Combat Vehicles - York, Pennsylvania 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Heights Complex 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artillery, Recovery and Maneuver 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAN ANTONIO SOD FARM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPPORT SERVICES 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kempenaar Dairy LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Central Texas 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metroplex Adventist Hospital 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR 407 466 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 407 405 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crane Aerospace, Lear Romec 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando - D021 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #6510 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago North Shore Hampton Inn & Suites 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHJ - Fort Dodge 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cape Cod Insulation, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haddad Subaru 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.