Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

E.R. Stuebner, Inc.

Reading, PA · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

E.R. Stuebner, Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 277% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. safety composite

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

E.R. Stuebner, Inc.: 7.4 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2020

E.R. Stuebner, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.5 from 7.4 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 277% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #227/251
  • PHOTO Ginno Construction o…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ginno Construction of Idaho, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.R. Stuebner, Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (277% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=9 · BLS 2.9

Where E.R. Stuebner, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 251 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate E.R. Stuebner, Inc.
E.R. Stuebner, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

E.R. Stuebner, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2019 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2016 7.4 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Reading

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ginno Construction of Idaho, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR XL CONCRETE MASONRY - RENO 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Falls #40 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angelone Builders 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Boise Co-op 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2078 - Clifton 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncreag-Opi-Charlotte-Reagan Drive 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MO007 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brevard Water Conditioning, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Out of the Blue Finishing Solutions 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA232 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1081-Home Cre of the Carolinas-Stn 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.