Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturing · Ohio

Eramet Marietta Incorporated

Marietta, OH · ~168 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eramet Marietta Incorporated runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Eramet Marietta Incorporated: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eramet Marietta Incorporated safety composite

Eramet Marietta Incorporated scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2022

Eramet Marietta Incorporated injury rate improved

Eramet Marietta Incorporated's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Marietta, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/53
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Ho…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Hoopeston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Eramet Marietta Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eramet Marietta Incorporated averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eramet Marietta Incorporated TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3 · 2018=5 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Eramet Marietta Incorporated falls in its industry

416 Manganese metal ferroalloys ma establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 53 Manganese metal ferroalloys ma employers in Ohio.

Eramet Marietta Incorporated (168 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eramet Marietta Incorporated
Eramet Marietta Incorporated (168 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Eramet Marietta Incorporated has more employees than the Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.4 4.8 2 8 0
2020 2.5 1.3 4 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2018 5.0 4.4 8 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 5 0 0
2016 4.2 3.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · OH · Marietta

416 Manganese metal ferroalloys manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 105 employers in Marietta, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Hoopeston 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elemet Technologies 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrence Brothers INC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMG Vanadium - Zanesville 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wheatland Tube - Warren, OH 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bescast 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whirlaway Corporation Plant 2 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honda Engineering N America - Anna 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health System Main Campus 1,787 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkersbug 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Marietta, OH (LPD) 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 561 FTE
NAT-TCR S04161 - Santa Ana Hauling 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Games Workshop - Memphis 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Priority Tyson's Nissan Mazda 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin's Counter Tops, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sandy Lick Location - SandyLick 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE IMI Precision Engineering 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aviation Security Management, LLC 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100657 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.